home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: informatik.tu-muenchen.de!fischerj
- From: fischerj@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Juergen "Rally" Fischer)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: C2P
- Date: 18 Jan 1996 18:35:02 GMT
- Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4dm3sm$pvm@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- References: <4cu7vo$17q@sinsen.sn.no> <4djdu8$ba@oreig.uji.es> <4dkbml$em2@maureen.teleport.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
- Originator: fischerj@hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-
-
- In article <4dkbml$em2@maureen.teleport.com>, sschaem@teleport.com (Stephan Schaem) writes:
- |> Organization: Teleport - Portland's Public Access (503) 220-1016
- |> Lines: 15
- |> Message-ID: <4dkbml$em2@maureen.teleport.com>
- |> References: <4cu7vo$17q@sinsen.sn.no> <4djdu8$ba@oreig.uji.es>
- |> NNTP-Posting-Host: kelly.teleport.com
- |> X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
- |>
- |> Jorge Acereda Macia (ii202@rossegat.uji.es) wrote:
- |> : Thore Bjerklund Karlsen (tbk@sn.no) wrote:
- |>
- |> : > Why not just measure it in scanlines? Why ms?
- |>
- |> : 20 ms. = 1 frame.
- |>
- |> : IMHO it's better to measure ms. instead of scanlines... Scanlines
- |> : measuring is harder in OS-friendly code.
-
- no timer is more accurate than showing the timing via raster display.
- you know any method with less overhead than the 8 cycles for a write
- to colorregister ?
-
- |>
- |> pixel/second make even more sense... 20ms mean nothing to me?
-
- well, pixel/second is not interestong, who wants to look an animation
- at 1fps ?
-
- |> 20ms to convert 320x256 pixel: is what you need to type.
- |> Or Just say type: 4mpix/s
-
- ok, the latter is less chars, true :)
-
- |>
- |> Stephan
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- fischerj@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Juergen "Rally" Fischer) =:)
-
-